Top Stories
SU students react to 2024 presidential election results
After Trump’s early Wednesday morning victory, several SU students told The D.O. the campus felt quiet, with many shocked by the results. Read more »
Andrews: Time is now for Syracuse to rewrite its November narrative
Column: Syracuse football is annually plagued by dropping games in November — the final month of the season. However, this time around, Fran Brown’s Orange are ready to fix the program’s late-season woes. Read more »
Awkward Fish’s branding goes beyond sustainable clothes
Holly Anderson’s sustainable clothing brand Awkward Fish reinvents typical apparel featuring one-of-one details. Read more »
I thought when reading the headline that this would be a graphic that compared the various building campaigns that occurred during each chancellors’ tenure, (i.e. 12 campus plans at the beginning/end of each) showing the most recent campus expansion into the city. That would be a more interesting study.
SU has put up some good looking building… that have stood the test of time from a design perspective. AND SU has some disasters. If SU had stayed with a similar classical look (and neo-cassical), the campus would look much better. Instead SU goes with the ‘most modern’ trend of the time, which becomes outdated in 15 or so years. Example: the new Newhouse building. Hence, we have an odd mix of styles… some beautiful (Crouse, HOL, Hendricks, Maxwell), some okay, and some horrible (just about anything built between 1940 and 1980).